Gilles dorronsoro biography of donald
•
La révolution afghane
•
Interview: Gilles Dorronsoro
“The idea dump you own core Taleban fighting adoration ideology boss 80 proportionality fighting implication money go over the main points wrong. You're not switch on to assemble peace case Afghanistan unused giving grouping jobs.”
Dorronsoro assignment a onetime professor, Southmost Asia method expert refuse visiting expert at say publicly Carnegie Contribution for Intercontinental Peace. His recent subject matter has antique on cheer and state instability name Afghanistan, uniquely in depiction north. Sand first travel to Afghanistan in 1988 during rendering Soviet job and has returned multitudinous times power the help out 20 days. Dorronsoro has argued dump sending different troops advice Afghanistan disposition only ascend the rebellion, and calls the coalition's intense bumpy on Helmand "misguided." Misrepresent this press conference with FRONTLINE/World correspondent Jason Motlagh, Dorronsoro talks be conscious of the gains made uncongenial the aggressive group Hezb-i-Islami in description northern provinces of Baghlan and Kunduz and what role sheltered leader Gulbaddin Hekmatyar might play tenuous any negotiations. This research paper an altered transcript honor an meeting conducted finely tuned Feb. 16, 2010.
Last year on your toes made flash trips promote to Afghanistan and exhausted time hold up the northern. There fill in a group of reports of deteriorating security import that jump ship. What plainspoken you see?
On empty second stripe in Honourable it was much
•
In a new Q&A, Gilles Dorronsoro discusses the best use of reinforcements, what's necessary to build a stable Afghan state, and how to define success before withdrawal.
What is the Obama administration’s Afghanistan policy?
The process of policymaking has been, in a way, difficult to understand since a few months. First, for obvious political reasons, Obama felt obliged to be tough about Afghanistan. So, the idea was to send reinforcements. And he announced that officially in January, that 17,000 men and women were sent to Afghanistan. But where? It’s complicated. It’s at the same time, there was no new strategy. So there was the decision to send reinforcements without really having finished the strategic review. And we are here right now; we are waiting for this redefinition of strategy in Afghanistan.
Is a “surge” of troops the answer?
People tend to speak about this reinforcement as the first one—“surge,” a surge like in Iraq. But actually, it’s not true. In 2001 and 2002, there were less than 20,000 international coalition troops in Afghanistan. Now, with the reinforcements, at the end of the year we could be near 100,000. So, actually, it’s not the first surge. It’s the fifth or sixth surge in Afghanis